<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Heart” versus “Mind”?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rentine.com/theshortversion/2008/07/02/%e2%80%9cheart%e2%80%9d-versus-%e2%80%9cmind%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rentine.com/theshortversion/2008/07/02/%e2%80%9cheart%e2%80%9d-versus-%e2%80%9cmind%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Love, Life, Meaning, Zen, and Science, by Norm Bearrentine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: normbear</title>
		<link>http://www.rentine.com/theshortversion/2008/07/02/%e2%80%9cheart%e2%80%9d-versus-%e2%80%9cmind%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>normbear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rentine.com/theshortversion/?p=148#comment-264</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thrilled that you approve, and that you added the example of your daughter. I have found the ideas you present in &quot;The Emotion Machine,&quot; to be wonderful enhancements to my thinking about how the brain works, and have referred to the book several times in this blog. I keep thinking that at some point I&#039;ll do a comprehensive discussion of it on my web site, but time being what it is, so far I&#039;ve only succeeded in referring to a few choice concepts as they appear useful to my current hot button issues; which is often. It&#039;s a truly seminal work that, once again, puts you in the forefront of creative thinking about how this machine works, and I thank you for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thrilled that you approve, and that you added the example of your daughter. I have found the ideas you present in &#8220;The Emotion Machine,&#8221; to be wonderful enhancements to my thinking about how the brain works, and have referred to the book several times in this blog. I keep thinking that at some point I&#8217;ll do a comprehensive discussion of it on my web site, but time being what it is, so far I&#8217;ve only succeeded in referring to a few choice concepts as they appear useful to my current hot button issues; which is often. It&#8217;s a truly seminal work that, once again, puts you in the forefront of creative thinking about how this machine works, and I thank you for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin Minsky</title>
		<link>http://www.rentine.com/theshortversion/2008/07/02/%e2%80%9cheart%e2%80%9d-versus-%e2%80%9cmind%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvin Minsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rentine.com/theshortversion/?p=148#comment-263</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that discussion.  I had not heard about those interesting Northeastern experiments, and I think that lab is only a 10-minute walk from my home—so I&#039;ll go and talk to them.  Anyway, I like your explanations.   This reminds me of another example:

My daughter was doing her high school algebra homework.  Some pop music was blasting away in her room along.  I asked,  &quot;How can you think with all that noise?&quot; and she replied &quot;Actually,  I can&#039;t think about math without it.&quot;  I asked what she meant, and her answer was, &quot;It must be because I&#039;m an adolescent.  You see, we adolescents are bothered by all sorts of irrational phobias and sexual thoughts and social concerns—and I&#039;m the one who my friends are always asking for help.  So I find that my mind keeps getting occupied with thinking about their problems.  But when I turn on this loud music stuff, all of social concerns go away -- and then I&#039;m free to think about the binomial theorem and stuff like that.&quot;

This looks as though the pop-music somehow saturates (or anesthetizes) her &quot;social thinking&quot; resources, and they can&#039;t interfere or compete with her math-related processes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that discussion.  I had not heard about those interesting Northeastern experiments, and I think that lab is only a 10-minute walk from my home—so I&#8217;ll go and talk to them.  Anyway, I like your explanations.   This reminds me of another example:</p>
<p>My daughter was doing her high school algebra homework.  Some pop music was blasting away in her room along.  I asked,  &#8220;How can you think with all that noise?&#8221; and she replied &#8220;Actually,  I can&#8217;t think about math without it.&#8221;  I asked what she meant, and her answer was, &#8220;It must be because I&#8217;m an adolescent.  You see, we adolescents are bothered by all sorts of irrational phobias and sexual thoughts and social concerns—and I&#8217;m the one who my friends are always asking for help.  So I find that my mind keeps getting occupied with thinking about their problems.  But when I turn on this loud music stuff, all of social concerns go away &#8212; and then I&#8217;m free to think about the binomial theorem and stuff like that.&#8221;</p>
<p>This looks as though the pop-music somehow saturates (or anesthetizes) her &#8220;social thinking&#8221; resources, and they can&#8217;t interfere or compete with her math-related processes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

