Posts Tagged ‘illusion’

Who is the Magician? Tricks of the Brain

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

Originally posted on 08-21-07:

 

An excellent article in the New York Times today, “Sleights of Mind,” by George Johnson. It covered several topics of great interest in understanding human experience: “…the cognitive principles underlying the magic… the narrowness of perception: how very little of the sensory clamor makes its way into awarenessinattentional blindnessthe role words play inside the brain” etc. The take-away line for me was, “With a grab bag of devices accumulated over the eons, the brain pulls off the ultimate conjuring act: the subjective sense of I.”

 

Free will wasn’t mentioned in the article, but the implications to me seemed obvious. I always entertain hope when I read such a piece in so prominent a venue, that people who read it, at least some of them, will see those same implications and start questioning previously held assumptions about themselves. Having just read a book by Tavris and Aronson, Mistakes Were Made, that hope seems incredibly slim, especially for people who have enjoyed some acclaim for their “self-initiated” accomplishments.

 

A great example of this kind of reality avoidance is Michael Gazzaniga, president of the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness, about whom there were several paragraphs in the article. I was always struck by examples of this avoidance in his book, The Mind’s Past. Early in the book he talked about “the interpreter. This one device creates the illusion that we are in charge of our actions.” (1998, p. xiii) Then at the end of his book he glorifies the very illusion he has exposed, giving it credit for “…the wonderful sensation that our self is in charge of our destiny.” (p. 175) Cherish those illusions, Michael, even though they’re mistaken. (This may sound familiar if you’re read the Free Will essay.)

 

There is hope, however, as the last chapter of Mistakes Were Made points out: “Dweck’s research is heartening because it suggests that at all ages, people can learn to see mistakes not as terrible personal failings to be denied or justified, but as inevitable aspects of life that help us grow, and grow up.”(p. 235) (This book is a great read, invaluable in understanding self-deception. A real revelation for me was how—and how often—mistakes are made in the justice system. Read it before you talk to the police.)

 

The book confirms my belief that the truth does set you free, and as it points out, that there are many benefits in accepting reality as awareness of it becomes available. Illusions can be fun, but there can be even greater satisfaction, and awe, in seeing how the trick was done.

 

Which is not to say that accepting reality is always easy. I cried inconsolably when I found out there was no Santa Claus. I went through a much longer, more difficult process of adjustment when I realized the ridiculousness of my Christian beliefs, trying to find comfort and security in a secular world.

 

I always seem better for it after these difficult transitions, but that sense of improvement may be the result of altered memory in an attempt to remove the disappointment of remembering a happier but no longer accessible state. Who knows…

 

The latest transition, which has been going on for some time now, began with the realization that I am not a free agent—I am an ongoing process, like the weather, whose course is determined by the interplay of an incredibly complex array of natural forces. My difficulty is in trying to figure out how to relate to my experience of myself in light of this ongoing discovery of its underpinnings in the natural world.

 

There are more and more indications that my struggle to adapt to this particular reality is not a solitary one. At least, the reality of the human situation is coming more and more into the spotlight, and I anticipate that broader exposure will result in a few more people saying, “Wait a minute! If this is true, then it means… most of the ideas I have had about myself, who and what I am, are wrong!”

 

What I am trying to do, in writing and in the podcasts, is to show that what might seem at first to be a dark cloud has a silver lining; that the more illusions we uncover, the more mistakes we accept, the better life becomes.

 

flame-vine-02.jpg

Will a Golden Glow Do?

Google  

Who’s in Charge, Redux: Our Lack Of Free Will

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

Originally posted on 07-31-07:

 

There’s a fabulous article in the New York Times today, called “Who’s Minding the Mind.”

 

Many people, including me, have been saying this for years, and the science has been accumulating: the impression that we are in conscious control of our behavior, our thoughts, our lives, is an illusion, sustained by the inability of the brain to access its own operational processes. This article describes some of the more recent research that has been added to the pile:

 

When it comes to our behavior from moment to moment, the big question is, ‘What to do next?’ ” said John A. Bargh, a professor of psychology at Yale and a co-author, with Lawrence Williams, of the coffee study, which was presented at a recent psychology conference. “Well, we’re finding that we have these unconscious behavioral guidance systems that are continually furnishing suggestions through the day about what to do next, and the brain is considering and often acting on those, all before conscious awareness.

 

The article briefly describes several studies that all contribute to the same conclusion, and reading the whole piece will help to flesh it out with specific instances.

 

While the article doesn’t mention that ancient bugaboo, “free will,” it certainly adds to the evidence that we don’t have it. Of course, there are still those who deny the full implications, and the article is obligated to mention one of those:

 

Some scientists also caution against overstating the implications of the latest research on priming unconscious goals. The new research “doesn’t prove that consciousness never does anything,” wrote Roy Baumeister, a professor of psychology at Florida State University, in an e-mail message. “It’s rather like showing you can hot-wire a car to start the ignition without keys. That’s important and potentially useful information, but it doesn’t prove that keys don’t exist or that keys are useless.”

 

Yet he and most in the field now agree that the evidence for psychological hot-wiring has become overwhelming.

 

What seems obvious to me and many others, but not to Roy, is that, given all the evidence of “hot-wiring”—the demonstrated instances of  behavior and dispositions being prompted by cues in the environment that are not consciously perceived—why suppose that our conscious thought is any different? Our train of thought, our conscious associations, are just as much the product of the inscrutable processes of the brain as are those overt behaviors on which scientists have so far managed to conduct experiments.

 

Speaking of others who have long been aware of the illusion of conscious control, I’ve recently re-read a beautiful essay by Galen Strawson, called “Luck Swallows Everything.” There are many other very well done pieces on the site I’ve linked to.

 

Another excellent work that ends up dealing with free will, is The Meme Machine, by Susan Blackmore. I’ve linked to her Wikipedia entry, where you can find numerous links to excerpts from this book and other writings. Her web site has much of interest, and among other things, you’ll find a link to this great podcast. The podcast is an interview done by Point of Inquiry, another wonderful source of information.

 

I think an insurmountable source of difficulty for many people in confronting the issue of free will is that they can’t imagine a satisfying, enjoyable image of themselves without the illusion of control. I have tried to show some of the many positive aspects of shedding the illusion in my essay on the subject, and in the last couple of chapters of The Meme Machine, Susan Blackmore presents a very positive image of life without it.

 

You don’t have to pretend that things are other than they are to be happy. The more we shed our illusions, the more beautiful life can be.

 

harlequin-eucalyptus-01.jpg

Happy or Sad?

Google