Posts Tagged ‘perception’

Timeless

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

Originally posted on 06-07-07:

 

After I got dressed this morning, which comes after peeing, washing face, stretching, and Tai Chi, I put on my glasses and stood for a while, gazing out my bedroom window.  An article I read yesterday in the June, 2007, Discover magazine, called “In No Time,” by Tim Folger, came to mind. It has to do with a quandary unearthed by physicists, that time may not exist below the Planck scale. It may be that time only exists on the macro level, with a rough analogy being that solid matter exists on our scale, but becomes space and swirling energy on the atomic scale.

 

This is pretty heady stuff, in fact it spins mine a little, but a remark from the article that came to me this morning was made by the folks at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, who standardize time for the US. A visitor complemented them on the accuracy of their atomic clock in measuring time, to which they replied, “Our clocks do not measure time… time is defined by what our clocks measure.”(p.79) That set off a stream of consciousness this morning that left me a bit giddy.

 

A la James Joyce: In a month it will be 07-07-07 which won’t happen again for a thousand years this date won’t recur for a thousand years either these shadows won’t be the same tomorrow the sun will be slightly more northerly they were different a few minutes ago by next year the trees will have grown perception of time is different than measured time scheduled activities keep me looking at the clock guessing how long it will take if I turn off conceptual thinking time seems not to exist…

 

Enough of that; back to structure. 

 

The idea of a connection between conceptual thinking and the perception of time goes back to Hui Hai, whom I first read about in Stephen Mitchell’s, “The Enlightened Mind.” He suggested that the key to enlightenment was just to abandon conceptual thinking. Now that I think of it, it goes back to Jean Klein’s “Who Am I,” who suggested listening for the space between thoughts, which I interpret as verbal thought, and which I tried to do until, marvelously, it happened!

 

I have learned how to depress activity in the verbal processing area of the brain for short periods of time, and the trick, for me, is to elevate activity in some sensory modal area, like seeing, so that it dominates attention, and verbal activity then drops below the level of awareness. It’s a very handy trick–lots of fun–and it may be that all those years of smoking pot gave me a clue to how it felt. I was definitely capable of long runs of verbal activity while stoned, but occasionally, and quite wonderfully, stretches of verbal quiet would appear.

 

The connection between conceptual thinking and the perception of time is an interesting subject which I’d like to explore, but right now there are a couple of projects I want to work on, and tempus fugit.

croaton.jpg

 What Is This ? Don’t Answer That


Google


Further Explorations

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

Originally posted on 05-21-07:

 

Yesterday I talked about one of the ways that meditation can improve understanding of our brains–by giving us another perspective on their operations–but there are many other insights available.

 

As we become better at focusing our attention on some non-verbal phenomenon, like our breath, one of the primary benefits is in learning to shift the major locus of brain activity out of the word-processing area.  Communication is of paramount importance to us as social animals, and as a result, an inordinate amount of time and energy are spent in the part of the brain that processes language. No matter what we are doing or sensing, we are usually commenting on and explaining it, either to whomever is physically present, or sub-vocally to someone in our past or future whose opinion or reaction might be important to us. This verbal chatter is nearly incessant, and nearly unstoppable, but we can learn to shift attention to other, non-verbal parts of the brain. 

 

Focusing on the breath is a good exercise because the breath is always there–we can always return to it when we find attention has wandered elsewhere–and when we focus on the breath, we are focused on a tactile physical sensation rather than verbal behavior. Tactile sensation has its own primary location in the brain; separate from, though connected to, the verbal area. The same is true of hearing, seeing, and tasting. If we can focus exclusive attention on any of these, and avoid any simultaneous verbal accompaniment, we will find a level of sensitivity and detail that is unavailable when our brains’ resources are being spread among multiple processes. The areas outside primary focus will still be active, but not at the same intensity, and not at the level of intensity required for conscious awareness.

 

One advantage of reduced activity in the word-processing sector is the sense of peace and quiet that comes when the verbal volume is turned down. If you have ever felt plagued by the unending chatter and repetitive idiocy that can inundate your awareness, you will be greatly relieved at learning to shift attention elsewhere.

 

The heightened sensitivity and level of detail in vision, touch, sound, and taste that become available with verbal quiet have entertainment value  that can’t be appreciated until it’s experienced. It becomes a real treat just to look at something as mundane as the kitchen faucet. Of course, you may find yourself wanting to clean things whose messiness you never noticed before, but that is another issue. 

 

While verbal activity will never lose its importance, it is wonderful to realize that the brain doesn’t have to be dominated by it. There are other options.

camelia-close-03.jpg

 Zoom In 


Google