Posts Tagged ‘responsibility’

The Final Chapter? No Free Will: The End of Guilt and Pride

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

Originally posted on 05-29-07:

 

I finally finished nibbling away at Po Bronson‘s book, What Should I Do With My Life? and I think this post may finish my comments on it.

 

There is a story near the end about a guy whose brother committed suicide, his feeling of guilt as a result, and Po’s sharing with him his own feelings of guilt. When I mentioned it to Eve, she said, “I remember it—don’t remind me.” It’s residue had not been particularly positive for her.

 

I have written so much about guilt in The Journal, and in more condensed form in the essay on Free Will, and talked about it in the podcast series, Bare Brains, that I fear I may have flogged it to death, but in case you haven’t been exposed to any of that, here’s a short version:

 

First I should mention the Twelve Steps of Alcoholics Anonymous, which have a long record of effectively dealing with guilt, particularly the 8th and 9th steps: “8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all. 9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.” The previous steps are a necessary preparation for these, otherwise you’re likely to do more harm than good.

 

Toward the end of my nine-year sojourn in AA, I began to have a somewhat idiosyncratic approach to the idea of apologizing for wrong behavior, based on the realization that no one is really in control of their thoughts or actions. While it is true that the things I do and say are attributable to me as agent—as the body/mind that performs the action—it is also true that those behaviors are the unavoidable outcome of the interaction of my particular physiology with the events that have shaped me. My brain is constantly calculating its next action, given its history, but I have very little awareness of how those calculations are done or what their outcome will be until I find myself thinking, saying, or doing something.

 

There has been a long and continuing debate about whether there is any entity in the brain that can act independently of anything that has ever happened to it, and I come down on the side that says the idea is nonsensical, along with Albert Einstein, Marvin Minsky, Douglas Hofstadter, Michael Gazzaniga, most neurophysiologists, and a host of other clear thinkers.

 

This lack of free will does not eliminate the assigning of responsibility to persons for their actions—the functioning of society requires this assignation—and if learning to accept it has not been part of our training, we will be retrained, or failing that, restrained.

 

Given all that, making amends to people in the tradition of AA, and apologizing, takes on a different light. If I find that my actions have caused someone harm, I make it right if it involves property damage or some such, in the sense of an obligation for the privilege of participating in society. If it is appropriate, I say to the individual involved, “The person I was at the time had no choice but to do what he did, and I regret the occurrence of that event. I have become a different person, one who would make every effort to avoid such an event, if possible, and I hope I am never associated with a recurrence.” Hopefully I am capable of expressing this with sincerity and humility—I generally don’t try unless I honestly feel that way.

 

The more such an interpretation of human behavior becomes a habit, the more general its application. I don’t see anyone else as being in control of their behavior, any more than I see myself in control. Consciousness allows us to watch the events of our lives unfold, without giving us any control over them.

 

With this approach, guilt and pride don’t make much sense. While I don’t feel guilt, I still feel regret over my misdeeds, and while I don’t feel pride, I still am made happy by my successes. I think there is a substantial difference between this and traditional interpretations.

 

When I got to the last two lines of this book, the point of view that has evolved in me gave them a little twist. Po wrote, “I used to want to change the world. Now I’m open to letting it change me.”(p. 365)

 

It is possible for the actions of individuals to change the world—Po gives many examples of this—but in my view, all change is part of a much larger process. The world changes all of us, and as a result, our actions produce other changes, and those changes produce changes in us, and on and on. While discrete individuals can be associated with specific events, their is no real beginning to the story, and no end.

 

I cannot “let” the world change me—it changes me will I or nil I—but I can recognize that being changed is the nature of my existence, and that recognition is a gift from the world that I greatly appreciate.

 

bridalveil-and-friend-4.jpg

This Water Falls of Its Own Free Will

Google  

Who’s in charge? Facing Reality

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

Originally posted on 05-15-07:

 

A few days ago I talked about Clark Strand’s article in the Fall, 2006, issue of Tricycle. He’s writing about his take on a variety of Buddhism called “Pure Land,” whose adherents recognize “…that we are essentially powerless to effect our own salvation.” Thus one comes to believe that he “…has no choice but to surrender to a power greater than his own.” All of which will sound familiar to members of AA.

 

I think the real issue is not so much a question of surrender, but a question of recognizing the reality of our situation. I think this is what Zen and the more contemporary Naturalism are all about. The more we learn about the brain and how it works, the more obvious it becomes that there is no central authority, no control room, no “self” that could be in charge of the brain and its operation. We are not the power that creates our selves and our lives.

 

When we realize that our thoughts and behavior, our decisions, are just the complex interplay of our history, our biology, and our current situation, that realization itself becomes a part of our history. When appreciated in depth, it will alter the way the brain processes information. We will find ourselves taking a closer look at the events and influences that formed us into our current configurations and be better able to comprehend their various contributions. We will be altered, and we will find this alteration effecting the kinds of influences we expose ourselves to in the future, the kinds of decisions our brain makes in light of its new understanding of itself.

 

So we are powerless in the sense that we are not self-determining. We are determined by the interplay of all the forces in the universe as they converge in our brains and bodies. These words you are reading now will be incorporated in one way or another into who you are and what you will become.

 

So it isn’t a question of surrendering, it’s a question of recognizing that we have never had the option of not being a part of the universe and the natural world. It is us, and we are it, and seeing ourselves in that way can be a source of wonder and awe. That doesn’t necessarily mean that we will suddenly be content with the place to which the universe has brought us, or stop trying to make it different, but we may lose the crushing sense of responsibility for having made our lives what they are.

 

We have necessarily and unavoidably been the agents of whatever actions we have taken in the world, but we are not the authors of the motivations and intentions that produced them. There can be a great sense of relief in that, which may allow us to be more effective in the future.

mackeral-sky-01-small.jpg

Self-Made Clouds

Google