Posts Tagged ‘self’

Science, Anger, and Forgiveness

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

Originally posted on 07-19-07:

 

About 6 years into my AA experience, I got very angry at my parents. I had read a couple of books by John Bradshaw, popular in certain segments of AA at the time, and I got so angry I called my parents and told them how sick they were, and how their sickness had infected me and made me sick and miserable. They had no idea what I was talking about, but they were apologetic, sorry I was so unhappy, etc.

 

My anger got less intense over time, but what eventually eliminated it was a scientific understanding of human behavior.

 

Many people have an aversive reaction to the word “science,” but we are all scientists, whether we recognize it or not. Everyone who follows a recipe, makes a phone call, drives a car or flies in an airplane is doing an experiment. They follow directions, and if they get the expected outcome, it means that the directions reliably lead to predictable results—that’s all science is, developing recipes for reliable results. The theories of science, ideas about why things happen reliably, are only useful if they suggest ideas that can be tested to find new, reliable, and hitherto unknown recipes. If a theory doesn’t suggest any testable ideas, it is useless, and if a theory is developed which explains all the previous results and leads to still more new testable ideas, it is more useful than the old theory and replaces it. That is why science is always changing its explanations—it finds more useful ones.

 

Thanks to my history, I have always been interested in science—sometimes more than others—and my ability to apply it to my own life and problems has improved over the years.

 

As science has improved its understanding of the workings of the brain, it has become totally obvious to neuroscientists, and to anyone who follows the literature—even the popular media versions—that no one makes themselves who they are. Brains are very complex systems, and given their individual, biological attributes, and the environments they are placed in, they evaluate information and come to conclusions without there being any agent, or self, in control.

 

My parents didn’t make themselves into the people they were. They were born and raised in southern Alabama, in a primitive Christian culture, with very little formal education—third grade for Dad and tenth for Mom—and it makes as much sense to be angry at them for being shaped by that environment as it would to be angry at them for being white. There was nothing in them that could have altered the reactions of their particular brains to the particular environments they grew up in.

 

Certainly who they were had consequences for me and their other children—some pleasant and some unpleasant—but there was no way they could make themselves different than who they were.

 

If anger at people for being who they are is irrational, forgiving them for who they are is equally irrational. What sense does it make to forgive someone for having one leg shorter than the other?

 

Of course, my irrational anger and resentment toward them were conditioned over a long period of time, and those reactions don’t disappear immediately. It’s as difficult as breaking any other bad habit when you realize that it’s causing you harm.

 

Fortunately,  or so it seems to me, my interest in this area of science continued, and the more convinced I became of the science, the more my reactions were defused. I came to see the scientific explanation as applying to everyone, not just my parents, and came to see that everyone’s reactions to me, and mine to them, were the result of circumstances over which no one had control. If someone dislikes me, it is no more their fault—or mine—than it is the stream’s fault for following the crevice in the rock, or the rock’s fault for having a crevice in that particular place.

 

Everything that is—human or otherwise—results from the playing out of natural forces in varying permutations and combinations. The possibilities are endless in their complex variety—no two sunsets are the same, even though they are all made of light, dust, clouds and wind.

 

We are all blameless: deserving no anger, needing no forgiveness.

backlit-aloe.jpg

These Thorns Are All Your Fault

Google  

Who’s in charge? Facing Reality

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

Originally posted on 05-15-07:

 

A few days ago I talked about Clark Strand’s article in the Fall, 2006, issue of Tricycle. He’s writing about his take on a variety of Buddhism called “Pure Land,” whose adherents recognize “…that we are essentially powerless to effect our own salvation.” Thus one comes to believe that he “…has no choice but to surrender to a power greater than his own.” All of which will sound familiar to members of AA.

 

I think the real issue is not so much a question of surrender, but a question of recognizing the reality of our situation. I think this is what Zen and the more contemporary Naturalism are all about. The more we learn about the brain and how it works, the more obvious it becomes that there is no central authority, no control room, no “self” that could be in charge of the brain and its operation. We are not the power that creates our selves and our lives.

 

When we realize that our thoughts and behavior, our decisions, are just the complex interplay of our history, our biology, and our current situation, that realization itself becomes a part of our history. When appreciated in depth, it will alter the way the brain processes information. We will find ourselves taking a closer look at the events and influences that formed us into our current configurations and be better able to comprehend their various contributions. We will be altered, and we will find this alteration effecting the kinds of influences we expose ourselves to in the future, the kinds of decisions our brain makes in light of its new understanding of itself.

 

So we are powerless in the sense that we are not self-determining. We are determined by the interplay of all the forces in the universe as they converge in our brains and bodies. These words you are reading now will be incorporated in one way or another into who you are and what you will become.

 

So it isn’t a question of surrendering, it’s a question of recognizing that we have never had the option of not being a part of the universe and the natural world. It is us, and we are it, and seeing ourselves in that way can be a source of wonder and awe. That doesn’t necessarily mean that we will suddenly be content with the place to which the universe has brought us, or stop trying to make it different, but we may lose the crushing sense of responsibility for having made our lives what they are.

 

We have necessarily and unavoidably been the agents of whatever actions we have taken in the world, but we are not the authors of the motivations and intentions that produced them. There can be a great sense of relief in that, which may allow us to be more effective in the future.

mackeral-sky-01-small.jpg

Self-Made Clouds

Google