Posts Tagged ‘sensory’

Who is the Magician? Tricks of the Brain

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

Originally posted on 08-21-07:

 

An excellent article in the New York Times today, “Sleights of Mind,” by George Johnson. It covered several topics of great interest in understanding human experience: “…the cognitive principles underlying the magic… the narrowness of perception: how very little of the sensory clamor makes its way into awarenessinattentional blindnessthe role words play inside the brain” etc. The take-away line for me was, “With a grab bag of devices accumulated over the eons, the brain pulls off the ultimate conjuring act: the subjective sense of I.”

 

Free will wasn’t mentioned in the article, but the implications to me seemed obvious. I always entertain hope when I read such a piece in so prominent a venue, that people who read it, at least some of them, will see those same implications and start questioning previously held assumptions about themselves. Having just read a book by Tavris and Aronson, Mistakes Were Made, that hope seems incredibly slim, especially for people who have enjoyed some acclaim for their “self-initiated” accomplishments.

 

A great example of this kind of reality avoidance is Michael Gazzaniga, president of the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness, about whom there were several paragraphs in the article. I was always struck by examples of this avoidance in his book, The Mind’s Past. Early in the book he talked about “the interpreter. This one device creates the illusion that we are in charge of our actions.” (1998, p. xiii) Then at the end of his book he glorifies the very illusion he has exposed, giving it credit for “…the wonderful sensation that our self is in charge of our destiny.” (p. 175) Cherish those illusions, Michael, even though they’re mistaken. (This may sound familiar if you’re read the Free Will essay.)

 

There is hope, however, as the last chapter of Mistakes Were Made points out: “Dweck’s research is heartening because it suggests that at all ages, people can learn to see mistakes not as terrible personal failings to be denied or justified, but as inevitable aspects of life that help us grow, and grow up.”(p. 235) (This book is a great read, invaluable in understanding self-deception. A real revelation for me was how—and how often—mistakes are made in the justice system. Read it before you talk to the police.)

 

The book confirms my belief that the truth does set you free, and as it points out, that there are many benefits in accepting reality as awareness of it becomes available. Illusions can be fun, but there can be even greater satisfaction, and awe, in seeing how the trick was done.

 

Which is not to say that accepting reality is always easy. I cried inconsolably when I found out there was no Santa Claus. I went through a much longer, more difficult process of adjustment when I realized the ridiculousness of my Christian beliefs, trying to find comfort and security in a secular world.

 

I always seem better for it after these difficult transitions, but that sense of improvement may be the result of altered memory in an attempt to remove the disappointment of remembering a happier but no longer accessible state. Who knows…

 

The latest transition, which has been going on for some time now, began with the realization that I am not a free agent—I am an ongoing process, like the weather, whose course is determined by the interplay of an incredibly complex array of natural forces. My difficulty is in trying to figure out how to relate to my experience of myself in light of this ongoing discovery of its underpinnings in the natural world.

 

There are more and more indications that my struggle to adapt to this particular reality is not a solitary one. At least, the reality of the human situation is coming more and more into the spotlight, and I anticipate that broader exposure will result in a few more people saying, “Wait a minute! If this is true, then it means… most of the ideas I have had about myself, who and what I am, are wrong!”

 

What I am trying to do, in writing and in the podcasts, is to show that what might seem at first to be a dark cloud has a silver lining; that the more illusions we uncover, the more mistakes we accept, the better life becomes.

 

flame-vine-02.jpg

Will a Golden Glow Do?

Google  

Timeless: Conceptual Thinking and Perception of Time

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

Originally posted on 06-07-07:

 

After I got dressed this morning, which comes after peeing, washing face, stretching, and Tai Chi, I put on my glasses and stood for a while, gazing out my bedroom window.  An article I read yesterday in the June, 2007, Discover magazine, called “In No Time,” by Tim Folger, came to mind. It has to do with a quandary unearthed by physicists, that time may not exist below the Planck scale. It may be that time only exists on the macro level, with a rough analogy being that solid matter exists on our scale, but becomes space and swirling energy on the atomic scale.

 

This is pretty heady stuff, in fact it spins mine a little, but a remark from the article that came to me this morning was made by the folks at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, who standardize time for the US. A visitor complemented them on the accuracy of their atomic clock in measuring time, to which they replied, “Our clocks do not measure time… time is defined by what our clocks measure.”(p.79) That set off a stream of consciousness this morning that left me a bit giddy.

 

A la James Joyce: In a month it will be 07-07-07 which won’t happen again for a thousand years this date won’t recur for a thousand years these shadows won’t be the same tomorrow the sun will be slightly more northerly they were different a few minutes ago by next year the trees will have grown perception of time is different than measured time scheduled activities keep me looking at the clock guessing how long it will take if I turn off conceptual thinking time seems not to exist…

 

Enough of that; back to structure.

 

The idea of a connection between conceptual thinking and the perception of time goes back to Hui Hai, whom I first read about in Stephen Mitchell‘s, The Enlightened Mind. He suggested that the key to enlightenment was just to abandon conceptual thinking. Now that I think of it, it goes back to Jean Klein‘s Who Am I, who suggested listening for the space between thoughts, which I interpret as verbal thought, and which I tried to do until, marvelously, it happened! No thought, no time.

 

I have learned how to depress activity in the verbal processing area of the brain for short periods of time, and the trick, for me, is to elevate activity in some sensory modal area, like seeing, so that it dominates attention, and verbal activity then drops below the level of awareness. It’s a very handy trick—lots of fun—and it may be that all those years of smoking pot gave me a clue to how it felt. I was definitely capable of long runs of verbal activity while stoned, but occasionally, and quite wonderfully, stretches of verbal quiet would appear.

 

The connection between conceptual thinking and the perception of time is an interesting subject which I’d like to explore, but right now there are a couple of projects I want to work on, and tempus fugit.

croaton.jpg

What Is This ? Don’t Answer That

Google